David Sereda

Ecological Concerns, UFOs, UFO Propulsion, NASA UFOs, David Sereda Films, Art, Photography, Books, and Papers

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Dan Aykroyd, Unplugged on UFOs - On CNN Anderson Cooper




Anderson Cooper Interviews Dan Aykroyd, June 9, 2006 Click on small blue question mark above Aykroyd UFO Movie Poster to see video. Or go to this link:

http://www.vidilife.com/index.cfm?f=media.play&vchrMediaProgramIDCryp=DB4378BF-F786-46CB-BA72-6&action=10

Order Dan Aykroyd, Unplugged on UFOs at Amazon.com, or get it at Best Buy, Rent it at Blockbuster Online, or Netflix

It is good just to get on CNN and not be laughed at entirely. I think Anderson Cooper did a decent Job. I am grateful to CNN and that they did not laugh at us. They gave us the chance to talk, less a few edits of what I had to say about Expert Witnesses. Good journalists let the experts talk and report the facts. So here it is:

I am amazed how many people in media can just ignore the Expert Military witnesses in our film, "Dan Aykroyd, Unplugged on UFOs." Which critic or journalist has more flight time experience than Gordon Cooper, more technical experience than John Schuessler, more Military Administrative experience than George C. Marshall, Paul Hellyer, more Space Flight Experience than Astronauts Gordon Cooper and Edgar Mitchell, more Military Surveilance Experience than Ken Storch, More Investigative Experience than I have (22 years, Professional Photography experience, plus several sightings) in the UFO field (plus 200 skydives, high altitude sky dives, night dives, and plenty of flight time), and tell me that one critic disagrees that UFOs are real? What do they base their opinion on, a degree in Journalism? Does that qualify them to Insult our Experts and tell them, "Sorry, you are deluded and I, being a writer, know more about spaceflight than you do?" That is what I want to know because that is what journalists did to Steven Greer's Project Disclosure (now in the thousands of Military, Commercial Airline Pilots, astronauts and Military Officers), and some are doing to the experts in this film. Disclosure of the UFO phenomenon is happening right before your eyes. You just have to pay attention. The only ones covering this up are us, every time we put those blinders on.

Then, we go to trial, and it is one set of Expert Witnesses against another on UFOs. Then you have a Case. But when a journalist decides to write a critique, as if they are more experienced than my Expert Witnesses in Aviation, and they say that this is all Weather Phenomena, Balloons, etc., I just want ask all of you, why do we give them so much power? Don't you think Gordon Cooper, a U-2 Test Pilot, Fighter Pilot, knows the difference between a Ballon, a Bird, and Superman? Why does the media get to tell Gordon Cooper, who was not or ever mentally ill, (had Parkinsons disease) that they know more than he does and are more qualified to make a decision about wether or not UFOs are real? Do you want Journalists who report what experts say or do you want journalists who are so arrogant, they pretend to be the best experts on every subject known to man?

11 Comments:

At 2:44 PM, Blogger Bobby T. said...

I wasn't sure where to post this (and I couldn't find an email address) so I figured I would just post it here...

I was watching the video "The case for NASA UFOs" and figured something out about the teather video which may indicate your size theory isn't fully correct (actually 2).

First off at the end of part one you state the objects apear somewhat translucent. If this is the case it would be completely possible for a translucent object to pass in front of the teather and actually NOT block it out! With the object passing in front of the teather, being completly lit & extremely bright, and depending on the state of the object, it very well may NOT cause a darkening of the teather on the video (especially when considering it's not filming in our standard visual light spectrum as you have stated).

Secondly, you can't really assume the teather is a full 12 miles in length in the video, because earlier in the video (while it's still relatively close) you can actually see the thether bunching up along the entire length. This would also help to explain why the teather appears so thick when it gets so far away from the camera...

At any rate I just wanted to point these out. Perhaps you can address them...

 
At 3:49 PM, Blogger David Sereda said...

Dear Bobby, If the Tether were coiled up, it would not appear in a straight line. If you listened to the NASA commentary, they said the tether is 12 miles long. It is not coiled up. Also, about your video ideas, look closely at the vdeo. The UFOs do not pass in front of the tether. Even a traslucent object would be easy to spot going in front.

 
At 4:00 PM, Blogger David Sereda said...

It is good just to get on CNN and not be laughed at entirely. I think Anderson Cooper did a decent Job and I am grateful to them that they did not laugh at us. They gave us the chance to talk, less a few edits of what I had to say about Expert Witnesses. SO here it is:

I am amazed how many people in media can just ignore the Expert Military witnesses in our film, "Dan Aykroyd, Unplugged on UFOs." Which critic or journalist has more flight time experience than Gordon Cooper, more technical experience than John Schuessler, more Military Administrative experience than George C. Marshall, Paul Hellyer, more Space Flight Experience than Astronauts Gordon Cooper and Edgar Mitchell, more Military Surveilance Experience than Ken Storch, More Investigative Experience than I have (22 years) in the UFO field (plus 200 skydives and plenty of flight time), and tell me that one critic disagrees that UFOs are real? WHat do they base their opinion on? That is what I want to know.

Then, we go to trial, and it is one set of Expert Witnesses against another on UFOs. Then you have a Case. But when a journalist decides to write a critique, as if they are more experienced than my Expert Witnesses in Aviation, and they say that this is all Weather Phenomena, Balloons, etc., I just want ask all of you, why do we give them so much power? Why does the media get to tell Gordon Cooper, who was not or ever mentally ill, that they know more than he does and are more qualified to make a decision about wether or not UFOs are real? Do you want Journalists who report what experts say or do youo want journalists who pretend to know more than expert witnesses?

 
At 5:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hallo Mr. Sereda,

I watched your documentary and it was great.
I think the humans are like in that one movie “they live (1988)” where they put sunglasses to see the aliens. In one seen you see this one guy fighting in order to make the other guy try out the sunglasses so he can proof the existents of the aliens among us. This is how its work. Probably the aliens must fly over New York City and land on the Central Park and come out the craft and wave us.
I have some other proof may be you didn’t see this. Is this maybe with the help of the ufo. Or we had planes or satellites then. http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm

 
At 11:35 AM, Blogger Frederik Krautwald said...

Dear Mr. David Sereda,

It has been a great pleasure watching and hearing your analysis on NASA captured video footage. We all know that UFOs are a well known phenomenon perceived by pilots, astronaughts, etc., and indeed the NASA footage shows a lot of these unidentified flying objects. Whether they be an outcome of extraterristrial intelligence is out of my field and knowledge to judge by watching these vidoes, but sadly the bare idea of ETI seems to be thought scorn of from a the vast majority of people. Lately, a guy, James Gilliland, has caught my attention, as he among others claim to have recorded several incidents of UFO encounters on video at or near his ranch at Mt. Adams, Oregon. You might want to get in touch with these people as the subject is closely related - James Gillilands website. Again, it is out of my field or knowledge to judge the authenticy of the information provided, but perhaps someone else can.

Thanks for the work done!

Best regards,
Frederik Krautwald

 
At 3:08 PM, Blogger Trey "Dom Perignon" Champagne a.k.a. xtiger70 said...

David,

Like an earlier poster, I searched high and low and couldn't find an email address on you, or a link to email you. Please consider allowing such an option on your Blogger.com website.

I have been conducting my own research for a while, and I recently ran across one of the films you put together. I am not a physicist or any other technical expert. On the other hand, I am a Christian. That's important because I tend to give more credence to research that keeps Christ (God) in the equation when exploring truth.

With that in mind, I have one tiny piece of the puzzle that I think I have come across that I would like to share with you. When in prayer, I felt the Lord reiterating the fact that he is the "Alpha" and the "Omega," the beginning and the end. Since I had been concentrating recently on Revelations in my biblical study, I decided to focus a bit more on Genesis. I have some key passages that I would like to discuss with you that I think may have been overlooked because of its seemingly simplicity. In the divine literature of the Bible, we have to acknowledge that his text is purposeful and full of divine knowledge.

I work in the engineering industry down here in Louisiana, and I have been trying to find a Christian engineer to run my ideas past, and you keep coming inot my mind. I have been avoiding it, but I figured I would at least give it a try in getting touch with you. I want to add an idea to your research in finding better renewable energy, and the time/space puzzle.

Please start a new thread, or email me. I am still not 'out the closet' in my ufo and alien beliefs, and I would feel more comfortable running my epiphany past you before I post.

Humbly,

xtiger70

 
At 7:25 PM, Blogger Jeff W said...

Hello David, I just finished watching this film and must say I find it very interesting. I've always had an interest in UFO's and the reason behind them. This video along with the NASA videos and the work you and Dan do together is great and hope you continue to search for the answer! I also have a question for you. As a fellow Canadian, most of these polls are conducted for the United States. I was wondering what your take was about Canada and their feeling towards this phenomenon? Thank you for your amazing footage and getting it out to the public eye.

 
At 1:41 PM, Blogger sam2sam said...

hello David

Love the video's.keep up the good work.
How do you view the of 'Billy Meier'ufo case...wher he has taken,hundred of ufo photos.

sam

 
At 2:55 PM, Blogger Conscious Matter said...

Does anyone know where I can get the song on the DVD menu?

 
At 2:57 PM, Blogger Conscious Matter said...

Does anybody know where I can find the song from the DVD menu of Dan Aykroyd Unplugged on UFOs? I'm dying to find out.

 
At 1:03 AM, Blogger searl2112 said...

DAVID- MUST READ THIS- DROPA STONES. THEY WERNT MADE TO SYMBOLIZE ANYTHING... THEY ARE THE ARTIFACTS FROM THE CRAFT... THEY ARE THE REMAINS FROM A 12 PHASE LINEAR MOTOR a GTRAVITY GENERATOR 12-22-32= 66 66 rollers * 8 (dropa diskS) = 528 a 12-22-32-42 would be 800+ rollers...PLEASE GOTO www.myspace.com/phoenixlander
WIL STILLINGS

 

Post a Comment

<< Home